CenCal IRWMP (Madera, Mariposa, Eastern Merced, & Upper Fresno/Sierra Nat'l Forest)
IRWMP Issues
 
HomeFundingNext MeetingsWhat is an IRWMP?What is a Watershed?Regional AcceptanceBoundary CoordinationIRWMP IssuesPublic Involvement

To see the complete public review draft of the California State Water Plan go to www.waterplan.water.ca.gov

The following information was gathered during our Community Brainstorming Session on February 19, 2009. Next Meeting: March 26, 2009 8:00 am to noon, Mariposa County Board of Supervisors Chambers, 5100 Bullion Street in Mariposa.Listed below in bold are the Resource Management Strategies from the California State Water Plan Update 2009, Public Review Draft, Volume 2 Resource Management Strategies. In (parentheses) is additional explanation about each management strategy. After that, marked Mariposa IRWMP, are specific comments summarized from the note cards from our community brainstorming session when issues and project ideas in our local region were initially identified. There is some cross over between issues – this is just the first cut at organizing our community ideas to date. This is an ongoing process, please feel free to expand ideas or provide additional input: Comments can be added at the end of these notes below! 
The majority of comments and concerns from our community related to Land Use Planning and Management and Pollution Prevention. Other areas that receive several comments included: Fire/Flood/Mud Management, Groundwater/Aquifer Remediation, Cultural Resources, Flood Risk Management, Ecosystem Restoration, and Conjunctive Management & Groundwater Storage. Areas that received a few comments included: Agricultural Lands Stewardship, Watershed Management, Urban Water Use Efficiency, Public Outreach/ Involvement/ Education, Surface Storage, and System Reoperation. There are some areas that received no comments yet, but still should be addressed. The remaining state Resource Management Strategies do not relate as much to our rural mountain foothill area, for example, desalination. Also note our group identified three important Resource Management Strategies not currently included in the state’s current public review draft including: Fire/Flood/Mud Management, Cultural Resources, and Public Outreach/Involvement/Education. Final consideration to note: water rights. Please feel free to continue your input and pass this information along!
1. Introduction
Reduce Water Demand: 3. Urban Water Use Efficiency (decrease water demand/decrease per capita use to increase water supply and quality benefit to the environment)
Mountain/Foothill: how are we using water?, should planning encourage or discourage community water systems?
Improve Operational Efficiency and Transfers: 5. Conveyance – Regional/local (natural & manmade facilities to connect buyers & sellers)
Mountain/Foothill: A drainage study of Coulterville and a portion of the town of Mariposa has been completed. An environmental study on both areas is underway. The next step is construction and installation of larger culverts and pipes. The project will cost about $2.5 million. 
6. System Reoperation (change or improve water system operations) 
Mountain/Foothill: replace aging infrastructure
7. Water Transfer (voluntary change in water distribution, saving & banking water, exchange of water/water rights)
Mountain/Foothill: no comments yet
Increase Water Supply: 8. Conjunctive Management & Groundwater Storage (surface water + ground water = more water)
Mountain/Foothill: decreased river flows, need study to look at well logs, changes in production, quantity, well depth to understand areas and trends, study effect of new well on existing wells, and study recharge rates of wells, need stream gauges on lower watershed streams, Don Pedro engineer has identified two deep intake projects needed to provide water during low years (if drought continues Don Pedro in danger of having no water), no mandated groundwater management 

11. Recycled Municipal Water (waste water recycling & reclaimed water) 

Mountain/Foothill: no comments yet 

 13. Surface Storage – Regional/Local (dam and off stream reservoir storage)

Mountain/Foothill: holding capacity, Saxon Creek 

Improve Water Quality: 14. Drinking Water Treatment and Distribution (regulations for water and community systems)

Mountain/Foothill: Mariposa wastewater treatment facility needs modifications to meet current discharge requirements (a. nitrate removal, b. metals removal, c. tertiary treatment/filters requirement and d. alternative disinfection to chlorine), Coulterville has aging system and needs additional supply, Don Pedro has aging system, water distribution and wastewater collection in Mariposa Planning Area (TPA) and all TPAs in Mariposa County, Don Pedro is close to capacity of existing water system, if demand increases they need a treatment facility plant ($1 – 1.5M) 

15. Groundwater Remediation/Aquifer Remediation (quality of groundwater due to natural conditions & human activities – active or passive – for potable, irrigation, & industrial use)

Mountain/Foothill: septic management & financial burden, natural contamination, nitrate pollution, cattle, septic, mining contamination, natural erosion, health department’s role on new wells at sale of property 

16. Matching Water Quality to Use (broaden water sources: consumptive vs. non-consumptive)

Mountain/Foothill: no comments yet 

17. Pollution Prevention (land use management for sediments and pollution such as agriculture, forestry, grazing, urban runoff, development, marinas, recreation, fire suppressants)

Mountain/Foothill: non-point source, sediment reduction, effect of TMDL on our watershed region, Mariposa TPA water treatment (current problem with organics removal and turbidity), storm water runoff carrying sediment & pollution to rivers, mercury and other chemicals from mining operations, nitrates, petroleum products, address runoff resulting from inadequate grading and drainage guidelines, codes, and standards, erosion and drainage resulting from no onsite impoundment requirements, grading during wet season, no standards for correlating grading and drainage to soil types and slopes, no BMPs (best management practices), fire retardants, storm water treatment and management in developed areas: Dettinger’s research (USGS) 

19. Urban Runoff Management (decrease pollution, increase nature resource benefits, decrease erosion & sedimentation, maintain pre-development hydrological systems, protect groundwater, manage flooding, control pollution into riparian resources, view runoff as a resource)

Mountain/Foothill: development related erosion, Many meadows on private lands in mid elevations are degraded and are not protected from future development. 

Practice Resources Stewardship: 20. Agricultural Lands Stewardship (farms & ranches producing public environmental benefits in conjunction with food & fiber, open spaces, rural characteristics)

Mountain/Foothill: poor management of farm/ranch property, stock animals & runoff 

21. Economic Incentives: Loans, Grants, and Water Pricing (incentives/disincentatives to increase desirable water use, pricing to increase efficiency without metering water)

Mountain/Foothill: no comments yet

 22. Ecosystem Restoration (improves condition of landscapes and biological communities)

Mountain/Foothill: invasive species, invasive species in the river canyon, To what degree have illegal marijuana farms in the watersheds impacted riparian areas and water quality? Can these areas be restored and defended?, Alpine and sub-alpine meadows are in need of restoration, and the Mountain Yellow-legged Frog may become extinct in Yosemite in the next 5 to 10 years if steps are not taken immediately to restore populations., Wildlife connectivity has not been evaluated., Consider the ecological impacts of the McClure re-licensing and the need for restoration., Invasive, non-native species should be carefully assessed, documented, treated, monitored, and maintained. The need to control invasives within the Telegraph fire area is pressing. 

23. Forest Management (water, timber, fish, wildlife to improve water availability and quality)

Mountain/Foothill: forest management 

24. Land Use Planning and Management (efficient and effective land use patterns considering: housing, economic development, sustainability, transportation, air quality, agriculture, and climate change)

Mountain/Foothill: planning issues, land management, global warming, change in weather patterns, ground water studies and applying them to land use regulation, integrate goals with county planning and institutionalize goals with county plan and ordinances, identify and describe Army Corps projects in the region – what is their jurisdiction in those project watersheds?, review/identify watershed sanitary surveys prepared by domestic water suppliers (surveys required by California Department of Public Health), maintenance standards for unpaved private roads in the county, population expansion, development near water bodies, integration of planning and water availability, identify what is sustainable by watershed and limit to what is sustainable, The land use patters within the County have resulted in a highly fragmented pattern of exurban development that is ecologically damaging (domestic predators; wildlife movement; invasives; fragmentation of flora and fauna populations; fire exclusion; etc). The need to engage County residents about these impacts and how to avoid and reduce them is significant., The development of such a large road network, as a consequence of the exurban development pattern, in the County has created a large number of public road miles (and to a lesser degree private) that must be maintained, which includes a large number of road crossing structures. Many of the County's road crossing structures including bridges, culverts, Arizona crossings, etc. are undersized and badly in need of repair. These defunct crossing structures impact hydrologic function; cause erosion; flooding; provide inadequate crossing needs for fish and wildlife; and degrade aquatic and riparian habitat. 

25. Recharge Area Protection (primary means of replenishing groundwater: 1) ensure recharge continues and 2) prevent pollutants from entering groundwater)

Mountain/Foothill: many Don Pedro projects related to water quality have been held up due to lack of funding, for example, completion of project to cover basin, mercury and other chemicals from mining operations, nitrates, petroleum products 

26. Water-Dependent Recreation (also includes activities enjoyed near water)

Mountain/Foothill: Expansion of Mariposa Creek Parkway

27. Watershed Management (increases and sustains a watersheds ability to provide for the diverse needs of a community)

Mountain/Foothill: improve watershed management, Floodplains along many of the intermittent and perennial streams in Mariposa have been altered and could be restored. Many of the streams could be restored in concert with repairing crossing structures (and restoring the habitat adjacent to these structures) to improve flood attenuation as climate change alters the flooding regime and flows., Research regarding the ecological status of watersheds in the Mariposa area is fairly well represented in the upper portion of the Tuolumne and Merced watersheds because of Yosemite. Outside of the Park, studies regarding ecological condition have occurred, but they have been smaller in spatial scale and piecemeal. None of the research efforts has been watershed wide. The need for understanding general ecological condition within the watershed would be beneficial in attempting to identify and prioritize ecological restoration needs. 

Improve Flood Management: 28. Flood Risk Management (enhance protection regarding preparation, response, and recovery while recognizing ecosystem benefits from periodic funding)

Mountain/Foothill: increased flooding due to climate change, increased frequency of flooding, relationship of snow line to soils (thinner soils at higher elevations that are more suited for snow pack not rain), now that the snow elevation is rising more rain is falling on thin soils causing flash floods, predicted increases in flooding
Resource Management Strategies not currently included in the state’s current public review draft: 

Fire/Flood/Mud Management

Mountain/Foothill: fuel load reduction, fire related erosion, Coulterville and Greeley Hill needs additional supply for fire suppression, Telegraph and Oliver Fire restoration, heavy unnatural fuel load, climate change increases fire frequency, temperate, severity, and size, moonscape = erosion, large fire lines, Westerling’s research (UC Merced), Fire suppression: install cisterns as proposed by former CalFire rep in 12 locations throughout County to fight fires?, Fire exclusion and development have created a large fuel load within all watersheds in Mariposa County outside of Yosemite. Fuel management practices should include control burning to restore ecological function within these watersheds including nutrient cycling; erosion reduction; and natural disturbance cycles., The Telegraph fire resulted in large areas of scorched soil, and the BLM most likely does not have the resources to significantly improve the ecological functions of these areas and adequately reduce erosion. 

Public Outreach/Involvement/Education

Mountain/Foothill: public education, youth, public awareness regarding watershed health and proper use of on site & public water and sewer disposal 

Cultural Resources

Mountain/Foothill: confidential information, protection of native plants, fisheries, and archeological sites, using trained monitors, burial grounds, cultural sites in floodplains, runoff from improperly drained dirt and gravel roads damage cultural resources, gathering areas for baskets, medicine, food, & staples, Job creation: train locals and tribal members similar to the CHIPS program in Calaveras County (ask Brandon) to conduct environmental (including cultural resources) assessments for future fuel treatment and restoration activities; implement these actions; monitor; and maintain. In line with this thought, Miwok tribal members expressed the need to protect their important cultural resource sites. They felt education and proper restoration work could help alleviate degradation of these important sites.
Resource Management Strategies not relating as much to our rural mountain foothill area:2. Agricultural Water Use Efficiency (reusing recoverable flows, net water savings by reducing agricultural use to increase water for other purposes while maintaining or improving crop yield)4. Conveyance – Delta9. Desalination10. Precipitation Enhancement (cloud seeding & fog)12. Surface Storage – CALFED (five specific surface sites – none are in the Mariposa region)18. Salt and Salinity Management (salt, lime, gypsum, and other slowly dissolving soil minerals)29. Other Strategies (crop idling, dewvaporization, fog collection, irrigated land retirement, rainfed agriculture, waterbag transport/storage technology)